2 600 m<sup>3</sup>高炉炉缸侵蚀特征数值模拟

doi:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1006-9356.20230015

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (4764 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The corrosion of refractory materials in blast furnace hearth restricts the longevity of furnace hearth. It is generally believed that the main reasons for the erosion of refractory materials in blast furnace hearth are hot metal circulation, thermal stress, hot metal penetration in deadman and alkali metal enrichment. In order to study the erosion characteristics of blast furnace hearth, a 1∶1 three-dimensional physical model was established based on the actual masonry structure of Bengang's No.5 blast furnace. The numerical simulation of designed furnace shape of Bengang's No.5 blast furnace hearth was carried out by ANSYS-Fluent software. Combined with the results of damage investigation, the causes of hearth erosion characteristics were analyzed, and the effects of deadman voidage and blast furnace hot metal yield on hearth flow field and temperature field were calculated. The results for distribution characteristics of hearth flow field and temperature field show that the trumpet-shaped abnormal erosion in the tap holes area is the dual effect of high-speed flow of hot metal confluence in the tap holes area and the direct contact of hot metal at high temperature. The elephant foot-like erosion under the tap hole is due to the intense scouring of hot metal circulation and eddy current in coke free zone along the side wall of blast furnace hearth. The voidage of deadman affects the circulation velocity of hot metal in "coke free zone" by influencing the flow behavior of hot metal inside the deadman. Sufficient voidage can reduce the erosion of carbon brick on the side wall of blast furnace hearth. When the blast furnace is in high yield, the increase of hot metal flow rate and the increase of hearth side wall temperature will aggravate the corrosion of carbon bricks. Therefore, high production rate must be matched with sufficient deadman voidage, improved activity of blast furnace hearth and advanced cooling performance.

Key words： longevity of hearth carbon brick erosion characteristics numerical simulation flow field temperature field

Received: 10 January 2023

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHAO Hongbo
	WANG Fengmin
	ZHANG Fu
	CHI Chenhuan
	ZHOU Zhenxing
	ZHANG Jianliang

Cite this article:

ZHAO Hongbo,WANG Fengmin,ZHANG Fu等. Numerical simulation for erosion characteristics of 2 600 m³ blast furnace hearth[J]. China Metallurgy, 2023, 33(6): 87-94.

URL:

http://www.zgyj.ac.cn/EN/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1006-9356.20230015 OR http://www.zgyj.ac.cn/EN/Y2023/V33/I6/87

[1]	项钟庸. 国外高炉炉缸长寿技术研究 [J]. 中国冶金,2013,23(7):1.
[2]	焦克新,张建良,刘征建,等. 关于高炉炉缸长寿的关键问题解析[J]. 钢铁,2020,55(8):193.
[3]	INADA T,KASAI A,NAKANO K,et al. Dissection investigation of blast furnace hearth: Kokura No. 2 blast furnace (2nd campaign)[J]. ISIJ International,2009,4(49):470.
[4]	姜华. 高炉炉缸结构维护之我见[J]. 炼铁,2019,38(6):6.
[5]	SHAO L,SAXÉN H. Numerical prediction of iron flow and bottom erosion in the blast furnace hearth[J]. Steel Research International,2012,83(9):878.
[6]	DONG X F,ZULLI P. Prediction of blast furnace hearth condition:part I - A steady state simulation of hearth condition during normal operation[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking,2020,47(3):307.
[7]	左海滨,洪军,张建良,等. 高炉炉缸铁水流场的数值模拟[C]//2014年全国炼铁生产技术会暨炼铁学术年会文集(上).北京:中国金属学会,2014:734.
[8]	ZHAI Q J,WANG X F. Corrosion mechanism research and microstructure analysis of Baosteel No.3 blast furnace hearth[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International,2017,10(24):1016.
[9]	SILVA S N,VERNILLI F,JUSTUS S M,et al. Wear mechanism for blast furnace hearth refractory lining[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking,2005,32(6):459.
[10]	YE L,JIAO K X,ZHANG J L,et al. Model and application of hearth activity in a commercial blast furnace[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking,2021,48(6):742.
[11]	柳园. 高炉冶炼中碱金属的危害及防治研究[J]. 中国金属通报,2021(5):15.
[12]	李建军,张磊,曾宇,等. 从鞍钢高炉炉缸破损调查结果反思炉缸炭砖标准[J]. 鞍钢技术,2022(4):13.
[13]	焦克新,张建良,刘征建,等. 高炉炉缸凝铁层物相分析[J]. 工程科学学报,2017,39(6):838.
[14]	傅源荻. 基于FLUENT软件的高炉炉缸“蒜头状”侵蚀模拟研究[J]. 天津冶金,2021(6):11.
[15]	马丁·戈德斯,瑞纳德·谢尼奥,伊万·库若诺夫,等. 现代高炉炼铁[M]. 沙永志,译. 北京:冶金工业出版社,2016.
[16]	郑玉峰,汪琦,车玉满. 高炉炉缸炉底温度场和应力场模拟分析[J]. 辽宁科技大学学报,2015,38(4):253.
[17]	袁骧,罗大军,岳留威. 湘钢2号高炉炉缸侵蚀形貌及破损原因[J]. 炼铁,2021,40(1):15.
[18]	肖志新,李向伟,陈绪亨,等. 武钢1号高炉炉缸破损调查及炭砖侵蚀机理[J]. 中国冶金,2023,33(4):87.
[19]	姜华,蔡九菊. 高炉炉缸用后炭砖中脆化层的研究[J]. 中国冶金,2014,24(9):57.
[20]	潘宏伟,程树森,余松,等. 高炉炉缸炭砖环裂机制初探[J]. 钢铁,2011,46(3):13.