|
|
Cause analysis and process optimization of edge crack for 980 MPa cold rolled ultra high strength dual-phase steel |
CAO Xiao-en1,2, ZHAO Hong-qi1, LI Shou-hua1, LIU Zi-quan1, XUE Ren-jie1, ZHANG Zhi-yang1 |
1. Automotive and Appliance Sheet R & D Center, HBIS Group Hansteel Company Technology Center, Handan 056015, Hebei, China; 2.Hebei Key Laboratory of Advanced Steel Materials for Auto, Handan 056015, Hebei, China |
|
|
Abstract The edge cracking problem of coldrolled ultra high strength steel (UHSS) CR550/980DP severely affects hotrolling/coldrolling process interface with strip broke at cold rolling stands and continuous annealing furnace, which has been a difficulty for UHSS production. Based on high temperature thermoplastic and hot rolling dynamic CCT curves, microstructure, mechanical properties and crack propagation were analyzed to study the cause of edge cracking. It is pointed out that inhomogeneous temperature distribution in transverse direction at finish mill and large heat loss at the edge of strip steel will lead to strip deformed at the third brittle region. Furthermore, with Nb improves recrystallization temperature, the edge of strip stays in non-recrystallization region which deteriorates the plasticity of strip, and it is easy to form edge cracks when the strain exceeds the plastic limit and rolling force exceeds edge thermal strength at hot rolling process. The microstructure of hot rolled strip edge shows fine and dispersed ferrite and martensite, which will form stress concentration and crack defects at the interface of martensite and ferrite due to strain discordance when deformed at cold rolling process. The crack propagates in the form of micropore aggregation, and occurs phenomenon that hot rolling has no edge crack and cold rolling has edge crack. Using edge heaters and optimizing of slab size press, finish entrance temperature, cooling water between finishing rolling stands, finish temperature, coiling temperature etc, the edge quality has been efficiently improved, and the edge cracking problem is solved.
|
Received: 27 April 2022
|
|
|
|
[1] |
康永林.现代汽车板工艺及成形理论与技术[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2009.
|
[2] |
唐荻,赵征志,米振莉,等.汽车用先进高强板带钢[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2016.
|
[3] |
赵岩,蔡晓辉,刘振宇.连续退火参数对980 MPa级冷轧双相钢组织和性能的影响[J].钢铁研究学报,2015,27(2):55.
|
[4] |
康永林.汽车轻量化先进高强钢与节能减排[J].钢铁,2008,43(6):1.
|
[5] |
李靖,关军,任志超,等.高强双相钢DP1180的平整轧制[J].中国冶金,2020,30(8):74.
|
[6] |
胡美源.低硅含铝高强双相钢组织性能调控及选择性氧化行为研究[D].沈阳:东北大学,2017.
|
[7] |
何方,王瑞珍,杨才福,等.Q&P钢在冷却过程中铁素体的相变规律[J].钢铁,2020,55(9):81.
|
[8] |
侯晓英,孙卫华,王业勤,等.1.0 GPa级I&QP钢组织调控及增强增塑性机制[J].钢铁,2021,56(2):132.
|
[9] |
曾路,吴腾,吴润,等.冷轧高强双相钢中残留奥氏体的作用[J].金属热处理,2018,43(10):1.
|
[10] |
邓永刚.高可镀性细晶高强双相钢制备工艺及组织性能研究[D].沈阳:东北大学,2017.
|
[11] |
孙航,褚晓红,唐梦霞,等.1 500 MPa级高伸长率双相钢的组织性能分析[J].中国冶金,2022,32(4):47.
|
[12] |
余灿生,张龙超,郑之旺,等.退火温度对钒微合金化780 MPa级冷轧双相钢组织性能的影响[J].钢铁钒钛,2021,42(5):158.
|
[13] |
李守华,曹晓恩,赵林林,等.汽车用1 180 MPa级F/M高强双相钢板坯高温热塑性研究[J].钢铁钒钛,2019,40(1):123.
|
[14] |
雍岐龙.钢铁材料中的第二相[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006.
|
[15] |
李守华,曹晓恩,张才华,等.汽车用冷轧超高强双相钢980DP动态CCT曲线的测定[J].材料热处理学报,2019,40(12):123.
|
[16] |
李润昌,张环宇,夏银峰,等.980 MPa级双相钢边裂致断带原因分析[J].中国冶金,2018,28(9):37.
|
[17] |
孟延军.轧钢基础知识[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2019.
|
|
|
|