钢包水模型比例对混匀时间测量误差的影响

doi:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1006-9356.20200386

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2418 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了研究钢包水模型比例对混匀时间的影响,采用几何相似比分别为1/4.5、1/7.4、1/10、1/17.3的有机玻璃水模型进行了物理模拟试验。使用电导率仪测量了钢包模型内流体在不同条件下的混匀时间,结果表明,模型比例对搅拌功率与混匀时间的拟合曲线的指数n值有影响。随着模型比例的增加,n值的绝对值逐渐减小,其中,模型比例小于1/7.4时,n值变化较大,n值的拟合直线斜率为-3.97;当模型比例大于1/7.4时n值变化不大,n值的拟合直线斜率为-0.19。同时,对于中心吹气和偏心吹气,n值的变化范围也不相同,当中心吹气时,n值的变化范围为0.25~0.75;偏心吹气时,n的变化范围为0.30~0.60。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	作者相关文章
	赵根安
	张立峰
	Conejo A N
	段豪剑
	周海忱
	董佳鹏

关键词 ：钢包, 水模型比例, 混匀时间, 搅拌功率, 底吹气

Abstract：In order to study the influence of the geometric similarity scale factor of the water model on the mixing time, the physical simulation experiments were carried out with the plexiglass water model with the geometric similarity scale of 1/4.5, 1/7.4, 1/10 and 1/17.3, respectively. The mixing time of the fluid in the ladle model under different conditions was measured by the conductivity meter. The results showed that the geometric similarity scale factor of the model has an effect on the exponential n of the fitting curve between the mixing power and the mixing time. With the increase of the model scale, the absolute value of the n gradually decreased. When the model scale was less than 1/7.4, the n changed greatly, and the slope of the fitting line of the n was -3.97; when the model scale was greater than 1/7.4, the n changed little, and the slope of the fitting line of the n was -0.19. At the same time, for central and eccentric blowing, the change range of n was also different. When central blowing, the change range of n was 0.25-0.75; when eccentric blowing, the change range of n was 0.30-0.60.

Key words： ladle scale factor of water model mixing time stirring power bottom blowing

收稿日期: 2020-06-24

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1860206,51725402,51904025);博士后创新人才支持计划资助项目(BX20190030)

通讯作者: 张立峰(1972—), 男, 博士, 教授; E-mail: zhanglifeng@ysu.edu.cn

作者简介: 赵根安(1995—), 男, 硕士生; E-mail: zhaogenan1@163.com

引用本文:

赵根安, 张立峰, Conejo A N, 段豪剑, 周海忱, 董佳鹏. 钢包水模型比例对混匀时间测量误差的影响[J]. 中国冶金, 2021, 31(2): 24-30. ZHAO Gen-an, ZHANG Li-feng, Conejo A N, DUAN Hao-jian, ZHOU Hai-chen, DONG Jia-peng. Influence of scale factor of water model of steel ladles on mixing time measurement error[J]. China Metallurgy, 2021, 31(2): 24-30.

链接本文:

http://www.zgyj.ac.cn/CN/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1006-9356.20200386 或 http://www.zgyj.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V31/I2/24

[1]	张立峰. 钢中非金属夹杂物几个需要深入研究的课题[J]. 炼钢, 2016, 32(4): 1.
[2]	张立峰, 李燕龙, 任英. 钢中非金属夹杂物的相关基础研究 (Ⅱ)——夹杂物检测方法及脱氧热力学基础[J]. 钢铁,2013, 48(12): 1.
[3]	吴华杰, 张漓, 徐阳, 等. 基于PIV技术的钢包临界卷渣行为水模型研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2016, 38(5): 637.
[4]	张立峰. 钢中非金属夹杂物:工业实践[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2020.
[5]	张启东, 钟凯, 邵俊宁. 钢包包衬侵蚀对内衬温度和钢水温降的影响[J]. 中国冶金, 2019, 29(12): 19.
[6]	靳宇, 崔衡, 张建伟. RH精炼底吹工艺优化的物理模拟[J]. 中国冶金, 2019, 29(4): 17.
[7]	张旭孝, 林路. 钢包底吹氩系统优化与工业试验[J]. 炼钢, 2019, 35(2): 25.
[8]	韩丽辉, 刘云, 冯根生, 等. 水模型及数值模拟系统在冶金工程专业中的应用[J]. 实验室研究探索, 2009, 28(6): 34.
[9]	XIAO Z Q, ZHU M Y. Measurement and calculation of molten steel flow velocity in argon-stirred ladle[J]. Kang T'ieh/Iron and Steel (Peking), 1995, 30(7): 18.
[10]	ZHU M Y, LOU W T. Numerical simulations of inclusion behavior and mixing phenomena in gas-stirred ladles with different arrangement of tuyeres[J]. ISIJ International, 2014, 54(1): 9.
[11]	朱苗勇,田郁夫,肖泽强. 吹氩精炼钢包内三维流动和混合现象的研究[J]. 金属学报, 1995, 31(20): 346.
[12]	曹磊, 陈向阳, 胡建东, 等. LF精炼炉混合特性及夹杂物去除的水模型研究[J]. 钢铁, 2009, 44(12): 27.
[13]	Fujii T, Nakanishi N, Szekely J. Possible relationship between energy dissipation and agitation in steel processing operations[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1975, 2(3): 193.
[14]	Satish D, Patil S P, Peranandhanathan M, et al. Mixing models for slag covered, argon stirred ladles[J]. ISIJ International, 2010, 50(8): 1117.
[15]	娄文涛, 刘壮, 王晓雨, 等. 底吹氩钢包内渣-金反应及脱硫行为的数值模拟[J]. 钢铁, 2018,53(12): 43.
[16]	李宝宽, 赫冀成, 陆钟武. 底吹钢包内流动与混合的数值模拟[J]. 金属学报, 1993, 29(4): 47.
[17]	Eksteen J J, Cloete S W P, Bradshaw S M. A mathematical modelling study of fluid flow and mixing in full-scale gas-stirred ladles[J]. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics An International Journal, 2009, 9(6/7): 345.
[18]	刘中秋,李林敏,曹茂雪,等. 钢包底吹氩均混时间及临界流量水模型实验[J]. 材料与冶金学报, 2016, 15(3): 180.
[19]	Terrazas M S C, Conejo A N. Effect of nozzle diameter on mixing time during bottom-gas injection in metallurgical ladles[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions:B, 2014, 46(2): 711.
[20]	Conejo A N. Effect of nozzle diameter on mixing time during bottom-gas injection in metallurgical ladles[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions:B, 2015, 46(2): 711.
[21]	Dhandapani P, Mazumdar D, Sarvanakumar R. Modeling and optimisation of gas stirred ladle systems[J]. ISIJ International, 2017, 57(2): 286.
[22]	Guthrie R I L, Oymo D. Mixing times in combination blowing processes[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Process Technology Conference, Mixed Gas Blowing. Chicago, IL, USA: AIME, 1984: 45.
[23]	Singh P K. Mazumdar D. Mathematical modelling of gas–liquid, two-phase flows in a ladle shroud[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions:B, 2019, 50(3): 1091.
[24]	Zhang L F, Duan H J, Thomas B G, et al. Fluid flow, dissolution, and mixing phenomena in argon-stirred steel ladles[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions: B, 2018, 49(5): 2722.
[25]	REN Y, DUAN H J, ZHANG L F. Effects of interphase forces on fluid flow in gas-stirred steel ladles using the eulerianLagrangian multiphase approach[J]. JOM, 2018, 70(10): 2128.
[26]	LIU C, LUO Y, REN Y,et al. Modeling on the fluid flow and mixing phenomena in a RH steel degasser with oval down-leg snorkel[J]. Steel Research International, 2018, 89(12): 180.
[27]	ZHANG L F. Mathematical simulation of fluid flow in gas-stirred liquid systems[J]. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2000, 8(4): 463.
[28]	Evans J W, Mazumdar D. Macroscopic models for gas stirred ladles[J]. ISIJ International, 2004, 44(3): 447.
[29]	Fan C F, Hwang W S. Study of optimal Ca-Si injection position in gas stirred ladle based on water model experiment and flow simulation[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2003, 29(6): 415.
[30]	Okamoto T, Asai S. Mixing time of refining vessels stirred by gas injection[J]. Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, 1983, 23(1): 43.
[31]	Mazumdar D, Guthrie R I L. Mixing times and correlations for gas stirred ladle systems[J]. Iron and Steelmaker (I and SM), 1999, 26(9): 89.
[32]	Themelis N J, Stapurewicz T. Mixing and mass transfer phenomena in bottom-injection gas-liquid reactors[J]. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 1987, 26(2): 123.
[33]	Mazumdar D, Guthrie R I L. Mixing models for gas stirred metallurical reactors[J]. Metallurgical Transactions:B, 1986, 17 (4): 725.
[34]	Conejo A N, Kitamura S, Maruoka N,et al. Effects of top layer, nozzle arrangement, and gas flow rate on mixing time in agitated ladles by bottom gas injection[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions: B, 2013, 44(4): 914.
[35]	Conejo A N, Amaro-Villeda A M, Ramirez-Argaez M A. Effect of slag on mixing time in gas-stirred ladles assisted with a physical model[C]//21st International Materials Research Congress, Mexico: Materials Research Society, 2013: 1485.
[36]	Ghosh D, Paul S. Model study of mixing and mass transfer rates of slag-metal in top and bottom blown converters[J]. Metallurgical Transactions:B, 1986, 17(3): 461.
[37]	Rödl S, Neifer M, Sucker D. Investigations on the fluiddynamic and thermal process control in ladles[J]. Steel Research, 1993, 64(1): 54.
[38]	ZHANG L F, LI F, LIU Y,et al. Study of mixing phenomena during RH refining using water modeling[C]//5th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing-TMS 2014 143rd Annual Meeting and Exhibition, San Diego, CA, United States: Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2014: 459.