In order to understand the difference of process energy consumption between limestone slagging and lime slagging in steelmaking, experiments with limestone as slagging agent were carried out in 300 t converter, and the energy consumption was compared from the angles of gas, steam recovery and steel slag production. The results showed that comparing the steelmaking process with limestone as slagging agent to that with lime as slagging agent, on the premise of reducing the scrap steel addition by 71.6 kg per ton steel, the recovery of gas (CO) increased by 21.5 m3per ton steel, the recovery of steam increased by 28.0 kg per ton steel, and the steel slag decreased by 31.4 kg per ton steel. From the energy consumption of lime fluxes, the energy generated by gas and steam recovery, and the energy consumption of steel slag, the average energy consumption of the two processes was -38.9 kg per ton steel and -23.9 kg per ton steel, respectively. The former saved energy 23.3 kg per ton steel at most and 9.5 kg per ton steel at least and 15.0 kg per ton steel on average compared with the latter.
桂满城, 乌力平, 朱伦才, 饶磊, 曹欣川洲, 徐晓伟. 300 t转炉石灰石造渣炼钢工艺能耗对比分析[J]. 中国冶金, 2020, 30(1): 84-87.
GUI Man-cheng, WU Li-ping, ZHU Lun-cai, RAO Lei, CAO Xin-chuanzhou, XU Xiao-wei. Contrastive analysis of energy consumption in 300 t converter steelmaking process with limestone as slagging agent[J]. China Metallurgy, 2020, 30(1): 84-87.
LI H,GUO L F,LI Z,et al.The research of low carbon mode and on limestone addition instead of lime in the BOF steelmaking[J].Journal of Iron and Steel Research,International,2010,17(s2):115.
LI H,FENG J,LI Y Q,et al.Thermodynamic analysis of limestone decomposition and CO2 oxidation effect in the early stage of BOF steelmaking[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing,2011(s1):83.